Which photography is true, which is a lie?

Fake ?

Poetry or truth ?

Documantary photography or 'malicious' manipulation ?

Falsifying picture detail or fake context ?

These three photos show always the same building, but in different surroundings. Are they digitally manipulated by photoshop?

No !

The building was photographed normally and the photos weren't manipulated anyway. The impression of different surroundings is caused only by different camera position.

These three photos are a quite good example for lack of 'veracity' of the former chemical photography as well.

Photos by Rainer Knäpper 2009 (with his friendly authorizon)

ALL IMAGES AND SITE CONTENT © WOLFGANG HOCK